Data & Research
prompts.
50 data & research prompts for Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, written and edited in-house. 30 of them are free. Each one leaves blanks only for what it cannot know — fill them in, copy, paste.
Hidden denominator shifts inside a dashboard exportFor dashboard readers who need a quick judgment on whether changing totals distort the reported trend.
Does this chart support the story attached to it?For beginners checking a visual claim through scale, encoding, and omitted context.
A source pack with provenance checks already attachedFor researchers collecting current evidence that can survive citation and origin checks.
Data-sharing requests arrive completeFor data custodians turning a request brief into a checklist that exposes missing safeguards.
Reuse existing evidence or commission fresh research?For research leads making a defensible call when current evidence may be sufficient but imperfect.
Weighted rates without the average-of-averages trapBeginners learn when percentages need denominator weights through one worked example and targeted drills.
Where does this source packet genuinely agree?For analysts separating corroboration from repeated claims and shared dependencies.
From field notes to an audit-ready observation recordField researchers receive a neutral, traceable record without blurred inference.
Research questions that expose the decision behind a briefFor beginners who need answerable questions rather than a broad topic list.
Survey responses checked for low-effort patternsFor survey owners judging whether inattentive responding could distort their findings.
Bring an outdated research brief currentResearchers receive a rewritten brief whose dated claims have been verified.
Scattered analysis notes, one reproducible handoffNew analysts turn fragments into a bounded record another person can rerun.
A reproducibility run ordered by dependencyFor analysts converting a paper and repository notes into a schedulable rerun.
Rescue an irrelevant literature searchResearchers get a ranked diagnosis before changing a weak database query.
Response-rate collapse, traced before relaunchSurvey teams get a bounded diagnosis before changing incentives or outreach.
Reproducible two-arm allocation from a fixed seedFor beginners needing a balanced assignment sequence that can be recreated exactly.
Computational appendix, rerunnable by a second analystPractitioners turn private execution logs into a bounded reproducibility artefact.
A survey launch plan built through four answersFor first-time researchers scheduling a small survey without missing fieldwork gates.
SQL logic scored against the result it claims to returnFor analysts checking query semantics, grain, null handling, and scale risks.
Is this experiment claim supported by its design?For analysts checking whether an A/B result can bear the conclusion attached to it.
Causal claims tested against identification assumptionsFor practitioners stress-testing whether an observational design identifies its stated estimand.
Which dataset acquisition route deserves the budget?For research leads choosing among buy, build, partner, or reuse options after a bounded interview.
Sample versus population without guessworkResearch beginners learn which group a claim can legitimately describe.
Six current sources with their weaknesses exposedFor beginners who need a compact evidence pack, not an unfiltered link dump.
How defensible are these qualitative findings?For researchers stress-testing thematic claims through a short evidence interview.
Decision briefing grounded in current evidenceFor beginners who need a concise, cited research brief tied to a real choice.
Missingness patterns classified without false certaintyFor analysts judging whether absent values threaten a stated analytical goal.
Search strings that survive systematic-review scrutinyFor review teams needing reproducible database syntax rather than a loose list of keywords.
Dataset readiness exposed before analysis beginsFor beginners checking whether a dataset can safely answer its intended question.
SQL assertions that catch silent metric driftFor analysts turning schema and business rules into executable data checks.
Confidential research notes become a reproducible methods noteFor analysts converting sensitive working notes locally without exposing raw material.
SQL window functions, learned by dependencySQL users build row-context intuition through a compact, cumulative lesson.
Why does the dashboard disagree with the source?For analysts diagnosing a metric mismatch before changing queries or business definitions.
Statistical results become a publication-ready results passageFor analysts tightening reported findings without changing estimates or certainty.
Can you resist the base-rate trap?Analysts learn to check prevalence before accepting an impressive statistic.
A controlled release plan for a research datasetFor research teams coordinating disclosure review, documentation, validation, and release.
Neutral survey invitations without demand cuesSurvey teams receive send-ready invitations without exposing the expected answer.
Synthetic data that tests failure paths safelyFor analysts needing a realistic fixture with edge cases but no copied personal records.
Raw interviews become a publication-safe quote bankResearchers using local models get reusable excerpts without exposing participant identity.
Which survey version should go to field?For researchers choosing between two instruments against a real decision context.
Which statistical model best matches this decision?For analysts choosing among common models without hiding assumption costs.
A fixed route from question to evidenceFor first-time researchers who need a dated checklist with assumptions exposed.
Replication work sequenced to a fixed deadlineFor research teams turning a study brief into owned, dependency-aware replication work.
Codebook readiness scored before dual codingFor qualitative teams checking whether two coders can apply the same rules independently.
Confidence intervals under pressureWorking analysts uncover and correct their own interpretation errors through a short interview.
Survey items scored for measurement riskFor researchers checking whether questions can support the construct they target.
A fieldwork stop-rule card for consistent collectionFor first-time data collectors who need clear boundaries on when to pause or exclude.
Has this research claim aged out?For analysts checking whether newer evidence has narrowed, overturned, or strengthened an older claim.
Citation lists checked for correction and retraction riskFor analysts verifying whether a source pack still supports the claim attached to it.
Sensitive interview text reveals re-identification riskFor researchers screening confidential qualitative material locally before controlled release.
Other categories.
Every data & research prompt, in your pocket
The whole library ships inside the app, so it works offline.
Coming to theApp Store
Scan with your iPhone