Which token naming scheme survives the next redesign?

What you fill in

• First naming scheme[naming_option_a]Examplesemantic role then state
• Second naming scheme[naming_option_b]Examplecomponent then property then state
• Current token sample[existing_tokens]Examplecolor.blue.500, text.primary, button.primary.hover, surface.raised
• Supported surfaces[product_surfaces]ExampleWeb, iOS, Android, and two white-label themes
• Migration tolerance[migration_constraint]ExampleAliases allowed for one release

How to use it

1. 1Open it in PromptVault. Find it in Design, or search for “Which token naming scheme survives the next redesign?”.
2. 2Fill in the 5 blanks. first naming scheme, second naming scheme, current token sample, supported surfaces and migration tolerance — the only things the prompt cannot know.
3. 3Copy and paste it into Cursor. That is the tool it is written for.

About this prompt

“Which token naming scheme survives the next redesign?” is a advanced design prompt. For design-system teams selecting a token architecture with migration consequences exposed. It is 244 words long and written to get a usable answer on the first message, in Cursor or any other chat assistant. Good for: design system, decision making, deep dive, comparison and handoff. Like every prompt in PromptVault, it was written and edited in-house, and it works offline once the app is installed.