PromptVaultWhich disclosure note best serves the reader?
For editors choosing among author-note options where transparency competes with pace or privacy.
Works with
- Ollama
- Claude
The prompt156 words · 3 blanks
What you fill in
- Disclosure options
[disclosure_options]ExampleNo note; brief endnote; opening note; linked methods note - Editorial circumstances
[case_facts]ExampleComposite chronology protects a source, but the sequence affects how readers interpret causation - Primary concern
[dominant_risk]ExampleReader trust
How to use it
- 1Open it in PromptVault. Find it in Writing, or search for “Which disclosure note best serves the reader?”.
- 2Fill in the 3 blanks. disclosure options, editorial circumstances and primary concern — the only things the prompt cannot know.
- 3Copy and paste it into Claude. It also works with Ollama.
About this prompt
“Which disclosure note best serves the reader?” is a intermediate writing prompt. For editors choosing among author-note options where transparency competes with pace or privacy. It is 156 words long and written to get a usable answer on the first message, in Ollama and Claude or any other chat assistant. Good for: decision making, comparison, editing, nonfiction and deep dive. Like every prompt in PromptVault, it was written and edited in-house, and it works offline once the app is installed.
More writing prompts
All 107 in Writing
Does this imitation borrow technique or merely copy mannerisms?For editors judging whether voice matching is convincing, controlled, and ethically distinct.- Interview testimony becomes a controlled first-person narrativeFor advanced nonfiction editors shaping spoken material while preserving evidentiary limits.
- Recast one argument for a different editorial habitatFor experienced nonfiction writers adapting a piece without flattening its reasoning or voice.
- Source fact-checking without surrendering editorial controlFor editors sequencing a source review while keeping verification separate from approval.
- A consent-bounded oral-history featureFor nonfiction editors shaping sensitive testimony within attribution, chronology, and privacy limits.
- A long essay compressed without breaking its logicFor editors fitting an argument to length while preserving proof, qualification, and proportion.